Custom Writing
Get the Results and Recognition You Deserve
Calculate Your Price
Word count 275
Price for this order:
Proceed to

A good conclusion is

In A good conclusion is logic and philosophy, an argument map or argument diagram is a visual representation of the structure of an argument.

Argument maps are commonly used in the context of teaching and applying critical thinking. The purpose of mapping is to uncover the logical structure of arguments, identify unstated assumptions, evaluate the support an argument offers for a conclusion, and aid understanding of debates. A A good conclusion is of different kinds of argument map have been proposed but the most common, which Chris Reed and Glenn Rowe called the standard diagram, consists of a tree structure with each of the reasons leading to the conclusion. According to Doug Walton and colleagues, an argument map has two basic components: «One component is a set of circled numbers arrayed as points.

Dissertation research grants

Marketing dissertation pdf,What is business plans,Critical thinking in management,
The other component is a set of lines or arrows joining the points. Dependent premises or co-premises, where at least one of the joined premises requires another premise before it can give support to the conclusion: An argument with this structure has been called a linked argument. Independent premises, where the premise can support the conclusion on its own: Although independent premises may jointly make the conclusion more convincing, this is to be distinguished from situations where a premise gives no support unless it is joined to another premise. Where several premises or groups of premises lead to a final conclusion the argument might be described as convergent. Intermediate conclusions or sub-conclusions, where a claim is supported by another claim that is used in turn to support some further claim, i.

In the following diagram, statement 4 is an intermediate conclusion in that it is a conclusion in relation to statement 5 but is a premise in relation to the final conclusion, i. Each of these structures can be represented by the equivalent «box and line» approach to argument maps. In the following diagram, the contention is shown at the top, and the boxes linked to it represent supporting reasons, which comprise one or more premises. Argument maps can also represent counterarguments.

A written text can be transformed into an argument map by following a sequence of steps. Separate statements by brackets and number them. Put circles around the logical indicators. Supply, in parenthesis, any logical indicators that are left out.

Set out the statements in a diagram in which arrows show the relationships between statements. Academic monstrosities produced by the official Nazi painters. Identify all the claims being made by the author. Rewrite them as independent statements, eliminating non-essential words.

We have government business plan of experience in advertising to students across a range of relevant brands, so it pays to work with us.
It can be something as small as seeing an episode of a television show, or as large as the struggle of moving to a foreign country.

Tags: , , , ,

Copyright 2019